|
November
18, 2001
i've been sitting here staring blindly at the
monitor. i have the urge to write but feel like i
have nothing to say still. i hate that feeling.
So i went exploring for new hand pics
instead. One of these days i'm actually
going to buy a camera and start taking some of my own
snapshots - but for now i'm finding some rather
interesting websites and learning things. (Note the pic at
the bottom - i've included some details about it.)

The worst
of all this is that i've been awake since just a bit after
6 a.m. Bleck. i'm falling into the world of
earlier risers - all week i looked forward to sleeping in
but my body has decided otherwise. i'm resisting
having a cup of tea with the hope that i'll get tired and
can crawl back into bed without waking up Himself. He's
still asleep - not snoring this time though, which i hope
means a better rest. What is it about the male
body? They seem to be able to fall asleep at the
drop of a pin, whereas women toss and turn forever?
No wonder men at the age of 50 still look
great.
Maybe i should
get mean and go give Him a jab in the ribs. Share
these dark circles under my eyes, damnit!

It feels good to
have the journal moved over here. And even better
not to have to deal with the popups anymore. They
were so annoying. There's not much i can do about
the old entries however, unless i remove the java script
used for popups page by page. i might do that at
some point, but for now i've just cleared out as far back
as last month only. And that took forever. For
some reason the search and replace won't work en masse for
that script. It did for everything else i wanted to
do, but not for the java. Drat.
i'm babbling.
Don't i have anything
intelligent to say? Controversial? Daring?
Well
controversial maybe ... or just plain stupid after last
night's debate with Himself.
We got onto the
topic of the upcoming play that the theater company He's
involved with will be presenting next year. And some
of the trials and tribulations of the activities
surrounding the producing of said play. A lot of it
baffles me, but i think the gist of the problems is the
fact that there are a lot of emotional, yet highly
artistic people trying to work together. A lot of
them pre-menopausal women.
Sounds kind of
like a box full of firecrackers with their wicks lit
eh? Okay i'll try to be nicer.
Anyway the
conversation went on from the problems to the actual play
itself and my interpretation of it. i admit to being
slightly jaded since the playwright is errr ..... has ummm
... artistic desires (i'm trying to be nice) ... that
would test the patience of a saint! Oops.
Slipped there.
my comment was
that i liked the play but that i didn't think it was a
stunning play. Not that earth-shatteringly deep (or
words to that effect.) When i first saw the trial
version of it i did indeed enjoy it immensely, but i came
away from it with the idea that it merely dealt with
issues that are commonplace. Wrong thing to say!
Apparently it
deals with black issues. Black as in skin colour i
mean. Part of the story line is a comical bunch of
old folks trying to rescue a war uniform from the local
museum and i will grant that this is definitely presented
as a "be black and be proud" theme. But
the other part of the play is that the daughter of one of
the old folks has just lost her own daughter (she died of meningitis)
and her guilt about not recognizing the symptoms (she's a
health professional) and how it's emotionally debilitated
her. And debilitated her marriage.
Well i take that
as female issues. Things that happen to people
regardless of their colour. But Himself pointed out
that black people haven't had the opportunity to present
the fact (artistically) that they have these issues just
like everyone else. i think i follow what He means,
but i think the problem in my mind is that i identified
with the mother/wife/daughter aspect - therefore missed
the 'colour' message. And i'd still hazard a guess -
opinion - that if you put a mixed race audience of
women-only in the theater for one night, the majority of
them will identity the same way i did.
He seems
to think i missed the colour message 'cause i'm a white
person. i don't think that's valid at all.
Then we got onto the topic of small towns and how they
aren't culturally aware. Well, no, they won't know
about things like multiculturalism since as a small town,
there just aren't that many cultures to explore.
That doesn't mean they are all backwoods ignoramuses
either! Being originally a small town gal, i'd like
to think i'm just a tad more progressive than the rubber
boots and sheep dung image.
Then we
moved onto the childhood experiences, and how His was
oppressive. At which point i got my back up and
stated my own childhood was pretty oppressive as
well. i know what it's like to grow up that way
too. He's not the only one to have a bad
experience. And that was then, this is now
and i like to think life is improving somewhat. And
i told Him He was wearing His colour on His sleeve.
Sometimes i'm a
lot more brave than i should be. Especially when
i've had some wine. Sigh.
So anyway, now
i'm sitting here wondering if He understood that i wasn't
trying to insult and that i actually enjoyed the
debate. If for no other reason than i was able to
form opinions, state them, feel slightly intelligent - and
not cry during the presentation. Which is what i
usually do.
i think i learned
something as well. Learned that while i might be
colour-blind, there's still a whole bunch of people out
there who aren't. That discrimination does still
exist and maybe i shouldn't be so blithely unaware of that
fact. But when does it stop? When do people
stop seeing the wrappings on the package and understand
that what the package contains is far more important?
Will they ever?
Note:
pics below are clickable for navigation
|


The
Musée Archéologique de St. Raphaël contains
unique displays on local Paleolithic occupations
in the Estérel Massif, with sites dating from
600,000 to 10,000 years ago (BP). From the
earliest period, stone tools of rhyolite, a
metamorphosed volcanic lava, have been recovered
at Roussivau. From the Upper Paleolithic, Périgordian
flint artifacts dating from about 25,000 BP are
displayed along with faunal remains from
excavations at Gratadis. One of the most striking
exhibits is a red hand silhouette painted on a
stone slab, dating from the EpiPaleolithic period
(ca.10,000-8000 BP). The hand is similar to others
known from Upper Paleolithic cave sites in the
Mediterranean region. Given its great age, the
painting appears remarkably fresh.
[Fig.1: Painted
hand from EpiPaleolithic (Musée Archéologique
de St. Raphaël; photo: Athena Review).]
|
|