October 24,  2003

       So, i'm in the second hour of my two week vacation!  Yes!  Considering the fact that it's been nearly 1.5 years since i've had a "real" break - i more than need this vacation.

      i started celebrating early by falling off the carb wagon and having fish and chips for lunch.  i shouldn't have.  Now my stomach is hurting and the food wasn't even that good.  And i feel awful.  So - another proof positive that processed carbs and my body just don't mix well.  i'll stick to "good" carbs, thank you very much.

      i've been reading back on earlier entries.  And it has me wondering what the next few months will bring, now that Himself is going to be home again.  We'll go through a readjustment time - that's a given - but i wonder what else?  This absence has reaffirmed my love for Him, but also reaffirmed to me that i need a rules-based relationship.  i need the reality of a Dominant person taking charge of me - even when i get snotty and rebel.  

      my ideas of a D/s relationship have totally evolved into something i believe is a lot more well-rounded than it first was.  But one aspect has always held true in my mind - a D/s relationship is about paying attention.  And if you don't pay attention, things start to fall apart.

      i suppose that can be said about any relationship.  And i could argue that this type of relationship is different, because we have a set of needs that are definitely against the mainstream.  But i'm sure there's many a person out there in Normal Land that would argue they have their own issues to deal with.  Having been in a variety of said relationships, i'd have to agree.

      Back to D/s however.  i think any relationship has to be grounded on a large variety of compatibilities.  And because there's that variety, there's room for negotiation of some of the strengths and weaknesses of each participant.  The negotiation does not negate the D/s - but in fact can strengthen it by clearly defining each other's role in the relationship and then accepting the responsibility of  the role.  

      i used to think that if we didn't play - then we were not practising our D/s.  But this absence from each other has helped me to see that we are, in fact, still very D/s - just not indulging in BDSM on a regular basis.  D/s (to me) is about domination and submission - and no where in the rule books does it say that those two words only count if one is constantly the floggee and the other the flogger.  

      Do i miss that part?  Yes i do, very much so.  It was "paying attention" at its finest.  In fact today, while cleaning, i found some notes i'd received from Himself in the past - small lists of instructions that i looked forward to.  They were never long and detailed - simple things such as changing out of my clothes, putting on the cuffs and decompressing after a day at work.  

      But even without those, or other activities on a regular basis, we are still very much D/s.  The past two months have underlined that fact; He's still the dominant  in this house, and i'm still the submissive. Regardless of the circumstances - be it deciding dinner, or obeying the 8 o'clock bra-off rule, i still defer to Him.  

      During the 2  months, the days that i did not have contact from Him were the days that i most often felt totally unguided and  not at all grounded.  i would have difficulty making any sort of decision.  i would be grumpy at work.  The days we had contact ran smoothly - i would send Him emails of the house bills, or phone messages, or whatever - He would respond with directions and i'd happily go off to do His bidding.

      So our natures don't change.  What changes is our method of accepting responsibility for those natures.  We get so comfortable in the blending of our personalities, that we forget to stoke and stroke the relationship.  

      A few weeks ago i gently reminded Himself that in all the time He'd been gone, He hadn't once told me to put on the cuffs.  Was He busy while He was away?  Excrutiatingly so.  But there were moments when a simple request would have been easy.  A brief email, an ICQ message.   On the flip side, did i ever tell Him i was feeling disjointed and anxious?  Nope.  And i should have.   

      We forgot to be responsible in our relationship - assumed each other was fine.  He was harried and anxious about His work.  Maybe i should have said Sir a lot more - to boost His morale and confidence.  And i was feeling totally undirected - maybe He should have guessed and sent a brief direction.  

      So.  Having said all that, i think we are a lot more D/s than i first understood.  When He listened to what i said about the cuffs, He understood, and i did in fact get those orders, twice.  It did my head a world of good.  It also helped underline to me that i've been lazy in my responsibility.  He sent the order, and i nearly forgot to carry it through.  If i were paying attention, that near-slip would not have happened.  

      It will be interesting to see what the next few months bring.    

            

     “Have no fear of perfection - you'll never reach it.”
       --Salvador Dali           

      Hint:  email  Hint: guestbook (quotes anyone?)

past future more journals
pre-time post-time center

Quote of the day:
"Everything's in the mind. That's where it all starts. 
Knowing what you want is the first step toward getting it."

--Mae West

Today's Weather is:

The WeatherPixie

 

Word of the day:

 

recidivism

 \rih-SID-uh-viz-uhm\, noun:

   A  tendency  to  lapse into a previous condition or pattern of
   behavior;  especially,  a  falling  back or relapse into prior
   criminal habits.

 

 

 

 

 

 

newhonor.jpg (40087 bytes)

 

New images donated by Shockdoc!

 

 

 

Pervy Site of the Day

 

the Bettie Page

 

 

 

2000 Archives

2001 Archives

2002 Archives

"Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self."
--Cyril Connolly